Derivation of a possible alternative system of thinking
HU  / EN
…Returning to the relative failure of Chardin's philosophy, we must conclude that Teilhard de Chardin's work can only be continued by those who, following the development of natural sciences and reality, boldly go beyond Chardin's concept, founding his system mathematically and physically, complementing it with the results of information theory and cybernetics. In this way he makes it internally uncontroversial and externally comprehensive and open, on which a fully-fledged systems theory can be built. We can only move forward with all this in advance..


The aim of my work is to present the derivation and outline of an alternative system of thinking that promotes the objective orientation of the human being and to explore the paths leading to a unified Christian way of thinking, which includes the following.

  • Identify the structures and levels of structure in nature and formulate them using mathematics and modern science.
  • It establishes their basic laws, their connections and their relationship with each other.
  • It enables the human being to see and coordinate with other natural phenomena.
  • It completes the order of existence and values by approaching the concept of transcendence and proving its possibility without contradiction.
  • By introducing the concept of an open system - with the help of information theory - it proves the open-system nature of the alternative thinking system based on energy, and thus includes the possibility and probability of further development.

This alternative system of thinking does not form a school. –Although it starts with Theilhard de Chardin’s system of thinking, it differs significantly from it and goes beyond what I believe it is.

 It has no history and probably won’t. – Okait a következőkben látom.

  • On the one hand, it works with a conceptual system of mathematics and science that is foreign to the church people.
  • On the other hand, the relative stability of the current philosophical system does not make an alternative system desirable that makes this relative stability questionable.

  • And the secular sciences — such as philosophy, psychology, and sociology — because they are too specialized and are currently in an analytical state of data collection, preclude an approach that specifically seeks synthetic synergy.

So my work has not been published anywhere so far. So what happens in the future?… I can tell you: I'm not optimistic!…

I would like to end this general introduction with a confession.

I confess that science does not prove against God, although I also do not accept that the existence of God can be proven by the natural sciences. But I confess that with the help of this alternative-mindset, one can arrive at an approach, a formulation, and a justification of its uncontroversial possibility of transcendence. However, proving the existence of God and grasping that certainty with reason and aspiration is possible only through transcendent information: faith in the revelation of God.


Download (in Hungarian):

DOC          PDF         MOBI         EPUB

Or read and download from Hungarian Electronic Library